• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Abo El-Khair, A., Khalil, M., Abdel-Kawi, K. (2008). BIOCONTROL OF PEA ROOT-ROT USING SELECTED MICROBIAL STRAINS. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 33(11), 8091-8103. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2008.200732
Amal W. Abo El-Khair; M.N.A. Khalil; K.A. Abdel-Kawi. "BIOCONTROL OF PEA ROOT-ROT USING SELECTED MICROBIAL STRAINS". Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 33, 11, 2008, 8091-8103. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2008.200732
Abo El-Khair, A., Khalil, M., Abdel-Kawi, K. (2008). 'BIOCONTROL OF PEA ROOT-ROT USING SELECTED MICROBIAL STRAINS', Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 33(11), pp. 8091-8103. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2008.200732
Abo El-Khair, A., Khalil, M., Abdel-Kawi, K. BIOCONTROL OF PEA ROOT-ROT USING SELECTED MICROBIAL STRAINS. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 2008; 33(11): 8091-8103. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2008.200732

BIOCONTROL OF PEA ROOT-ROT USING SELECTED MICROBIAL STRAINS

Article 1, Volume 33, Issue 11, November 2008, Page 8091-8103  XML PDF (626.1 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jacb.2008.200732
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Amal W. Abo El-Khair1; M.N.A. Khalil2; K.A. Abdel-Kawi1
1Soils, Water and Environ. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt.
2Plant Pathology Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Fusarium solani, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Macrophomina phseolina and Sclerotium rolfsii, were isolated from diseased pea root rot from different localities, i.e., Giza, Ismailia, Sharkiya, Qalubiya and Behiera Governorates. Results indicated that R. solani and F. solani were the most dominant in all Governorates.  All the isolated fungi were pathogenic to pea plants, however, they varied in their virulence. In general, R. solani and F. solani were the most virulent.
Some salts, bioagents and antioxidants were used as seed soaking as compared with the fungicidal Rizolex-T to control root-rot disease of pea, under greenhouse and field conditions. Results indicated that all the tested materials reduced pre- and post-emergence damping-off and increased the survival of plants as well as their yield and improved their quality (pod characteristics). These materials varied in their efficiency. The standard fungicide (Rhizolex-T) was the best in controlling the disease followed by acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), sodium salicylate (as antioxidant) and monopotassium sulphate (as salt), which gave good effects in controlling pea root rot disease as well as increased pea yield survival. Meantime, Pseudomonas fluorsecens and Bacillus subtilis (as bioagents) were moderately effective with Ca 64%, 78% and 75% for Serratia, Pseudomonas fluorsecens and Bacillus subtilis, respectively in comparison with 53% for control. On the other hand, calcium chloride (salt) and Serratia (bioagent) were the least effective ones. The best materials were considered non harmful control methods, which have advantage. Therefore, such materials should be used as effective and safe means for controlling soil-borne plant pathogens in order to avoid environmental pollution through decreasing chemical fungicides use.
Keywords
Pea root-rot; biocontrol; Bacillus subtilis; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Serratia
Statistics
Article View: 116
PDF Download: 405
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.