• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
El-Shahat, M., El-Sheshtawy, A., Ghanem,, K. (2023). How do Biostimulants Support Sweet Potato Production in an Organic and Sustainable Farming System?. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 14(5), 51-56. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2023.206216.1051
M. M. El-Shahat; A. A. El-Sheshtawy; Kh. M. Ghanem,. "How do Biostimulants Support Sweet Potato Production in an Organic and Sustainable Farming System?". Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 14, 5, 2023, 51-56. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2023.206216.1051
El-Shahat, M., El-Sheshtawy, A., Ghanem,, K. (2023). 'How do Biostimulants Support Sweet Potato Production in an Organic and Sustainable Farming System?', Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 14(5), pp. 51-56. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2023.206216.1051
El-Shahat, M., El-Sheshtawy, A., Ghanem,, K. How do Biostimulants Support Sweet Potato Production in an Organic and Sustainable Farming System?. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 2023; 14(5): 51-56. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2023.206216.1051

How do Biostimulants Support Sweet Potato Production in an Organic and Sustainable Farming System?

Article 2, Volume 14, Issue 5, May 2023, Page 51-56  XML PDF (876.29 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jacb.2023.206216.1051
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. M. El-Shahat email ; A. A. El-Sheshtawy; Kh. M. Ghanem,
Environ. and Bio. Agric. Dept., Fac. Agric., Al-Azhar Univ., Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
A pot experiment was carried out at the Experimental Farm of Environ. & Bio-Agriculture Dept, Fac. Agric., Al-Azhar Univ., Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt, during the summer season of 2022 to study the impact of some Plants biostimulants (PGPR, AMF, Chlorella extract, EM, and vermi tea) on growth, chemical composition and yield in Ipomoea batatas L plants. Sweet potato grown organically. Results could be summarized as follows: All treatments using biostimulants increased all vegetative growth parameters of sweet potato plant. As for chlorophyll A, B and total chlorophyll, the use of biostimulants, especially vermi tea (Treatment No. 7), had positive results. As for the chemical properties, treatment 9 (compost with mycorrhiza inoculation, PGPR and chlorella extract gave the best value for carotenoids), and both treatment 7 (compost & vermi tea) and treatment 10 (compost with mycorrhizal inoculation, PGPR, chlorella extract and vermi tea) gave the best value. Ascorbic acid value. As for fats, there were no differences between the control (the recommended dose of chemical fertilizer) and between treatments 5 (compost + chlorella extract), treatment 8 (compost, mycorrhiza, PGPR and vermi-tea). Regarding protein, treatments 3 (compost with inoculation with mycorrhiza) and treatment 4 (compost with PGPR) were the best, and treatment 3 was better for fiber. Regarding sugars, treatments 3, 4, 7 and 8 were the best, and treatment 10 was superior to all treatments in the percentage of starch. As for moisture, the highest moisture content was using treatment 2 (compost alone), and treatment 10 and it outperformed all treatments.
Keywords
Organic farming; Compost; EM; Vermi tea; Biostimulants
Statistics
Article View: 271
PDF Download: 492
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.